When our client Robert first came to
Schulman Blitz, LLP, his potential malpractice case had already been turned down by several other top New York law firms.
Robert told us that he was married, and that he had recently become a father to a young daughter. He told us that he had graduated from the University of Michigan and went on to become an acclaimed painter, writer and artist.
Robert also told us that he was a survivor of cystic fibrosis, a disease he had been living with since being diagnosed as a child. In fact, by the time he first came to us, Robert had already outlived the life expectancy of an average cystic fibrosis patient.
He told us that he already had a kidney transplant and two double lung transplants prior to any of the malpractice he alleged had even occurred. Robert, admittedly, did not have long to live.
Additionally, the malpractice claims that he was making were against the surgeon who performed his second double lung transplant, a highly regarded physician who not only had saved his life with a successful double lung transplant surgery, but who was also one of the world’s top lung transplant surgeons as well as the director of the lung transplant program at one of the best hospitals in the country.
Robert’s medical records consisted of over 30,000 pages, which we analyzed meticulously and sent to our team of experts for review.
The first batch of expert physicians that we retained could not all collectively agree that malpractice had actually occurred, and they were not convinced that we had a viable case to pursue on Robert’s behalf.
But we were undeterred. The second group of expert physicians that we retained to review the records all agreed that malpractice had in fact occurred and that Robert’s ongoing pain and suffering resulted from the negligent post-lung transplant care of his surgeon.
We then filed a medical malpractice lawsuit on Robert’s behalf and proceeded to litigate the case.
The malpractice arose during the months and years after Robert received his second double lung transplant, while he was an outpatient at the Adult Lung Transplant Program at a world–renowned New York City hospital. The program required Robert to go to the hospital periodically for his surgeon to conduct postoperative surveillance bronchoscopies, a procedure in which a camera was inserted through Robert’s mouth and down his throat, to allow his surgeon to view his lungs and determine the success of the lung transplant.
It was during this time when a small granuloma was first seen on Robert’s vocal cords. Despite noting the presence of the granuloma in Robert’s medical records, nothing was done to treat it. Over the course of about a year, the small granuloma grew to a nodule and then to three nodules. Despite the fact that lung transplant recipients are at a much higher risk of developing cancer due to the immunosuppressant medications that they are required to take so that their body does not reject the new lungs, nothing was done to treat the nodules that were clearly visible through the camera that was being used during the bronchoscopies.
Eventually, those nodules grew to become a lesion that developed into stage IVa cancer of the larynx and a hyper-intensive lobulated mass of his vocal cords and airway.
The cancer required Robert to undergo a total laryngectomy, a surgery done to remove Robert’s voice box. Without his voice box, Robert lost his ability to speak and communicate with his wife and daughter. He was forced to write words down on paper or mouth words to communicate. Eventually, even that became too difficult, as the cancer had begun to spread to other parties of his body. Additionally, Robert lost the ability to chew solid food and required all food that he ingested to be in liquid form. In order to get proper nutrition, Robert had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube implanted into his stomach.
